emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#69960: closed ([PATCH gnome-team 0/2] Fix todoman test failure)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#69960: closed ([PATCH gnome-team 0/2] Fix todoman test failure)
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 11:18:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:15:39 +0100
with message-id <9d9aeb94ccf58ac11ba5e9fe3f3973155049f2d1.camel@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [PATCH gnome-team 2/2] gnu: todoman: Fix tests.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #69960,
regarding [PATCH gnome-team 0/2] Fix todoman test failure
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
69960: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=69960
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH gnome-team 0/2] Fix todoman test failure Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 11:24:33 +0100 User-agent: Evolution 3.48.4
Dear Guix,

The todoman test suite should be run with the "ci" hypothesis profile, so as
to disable deadlines and other nice improvements.

What do you think?

Best regards,

Vivien

Vivien Kraus (2):
  gnu: todoman: Update style.
  gnu: todoman: Fix tests.

 gnu/packages/task-management.scm | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)


base-commit: a9951a74a591a9b22ee2d93d8efe0523c6c42c97
-- 
2.41.0



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [PATCH gnome-team 2/2] gnu: todoman: Fix tests. Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:15:39 +0100 User-agent: Evolution 3.46.4
Am Samstag, dem 23.03.2024 um 11:52 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus:
> Le samedi 23 mars 2024 à 11:50 +0100, Liliana Marie Prikler a écrit :
> > Am Samstag, dem 23.03.2024 um 11:21 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus:
> > > * gnu/packages/task-management.scm (todoman) [#:phase 'check]:
> > > Load the `ci' hypothesis profile provided by upstream.
> > > 
> > > Change-Id: I2ea01f8c424a50cd617303f8338f92563e7b0204
> > SGTM.  If you're okay with it, I'd locally rephrase this to
> > [#:phases] <check> and push it with that change once it's confirmed
> > by the rest,WDTY?
> 
> Sorry, I always hesitate with this. I will try my best to do the
> correct thing in the future, but in the mean time, please go ahead.
It's fine – I do fall back to my own writing style a lot, and the
guidelines aren't super close on the details as of yet, so I sometimes
go ahead with edits and hesitate at other times.

Anyway, pushed.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]