bug#69738: closed ([BUG] rmail-mail-new-frame doesn't delete the new frame after composing the message on Emacs 29.2)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:57:25 +0200
with message-id <86edc42c96.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#69738: [BUG] rmail-mail-new-frame doesn't delete the 
new frame after composing the message on Emacs 29.2
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #69738,
regarding [BUG] rmail-mail-new-frame doesn't delete the new frame after 
composing the message on Emacs 29.2
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
69738: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=69738
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [BUG] rmail-mail-new-frame doesn't delete the new frame after composing the message on Emacs 29.2
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:49:54 +0000
>
>
>
>
> For brevity I don't include the steps for C-c nor for C-s but only for 
> C-d and C-k; but I can assure you that the case of C-c would yield the 
> same result; I wonder what the desired result would be for C-s instead.
>
> Steps to reproduce:
>
> emacs -Q -nw
> M-: (setq rmail-mail-new-frame t)
> M-x rmail
> m
> C-c C-d
>
> alternatively, use C-c C-k on the last line.
>
> Expected result:
> The frame is deleted (as the manual specifies at the end of 34.10).
>
> Actual result:
> The frame is not deleted.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#69738: [BUG] rmail-mail-new-frame doesn't delete the new frame after composing the message on Emacs 29.2
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:57:25 +0200
>
>
>
>
> > Cc: 69738@debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:54:47 +0200
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> > 
> > > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:49:54 +0000
> > > From: rameiko87@posteo.net
> > > 
> > > For brevity I don't include the steps for C-c nor for C-s but only for 
> > > C-d and C-k; but I can assure you that the case of C-c would yield the 
> > > same result; I wonder what the desired result would be for C-s instead.
> > > 
> > > Steps to reproduce:
> > > 
> > > emacs -Q -nw
> > > M-: (setq rmail-mail-new-frame t)
> > > M-x rmail
> > > m
> > > C-c C-d
> > > 
> > > alternatively, use C-c C-k on the last line.
> > > 
> > > Expected result:
> > > The frame is deleted (as the manual specifies at the end of 34.10).
> > > 
> > > Actual result:
> > > The frame is not deleted.
> > 
> > It's a documentation bug: that frame is deleted only if certain
> > conditions are met.  One of those conditions is that there are
> > visible frames on display besides the frame where the message was
> > composed.  In the -nw session, that condition is not met.  See
> > rmail-mail-return for more details about what is actually being done
> > in each case.
> > 
> > IOW: this is a feature, and (IMO) a reasonable one at that, it just
> > needs a better documentation.
>
> I've now made the documentation more accurate (on the emacs-29
> branch), and I'm therefore closing this bug.
>
>
> --- End Message ---