bug#69731: closed ([PATCH 0/2] Fix prosody system test)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2024 13:29:27 +0100
with message-id <bd0b8a27f87abb2cd12f178c471a5b4662bc4e51.camel@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [bug#69731] [PATCH 0/2] Fix prosody system test
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #69731,
regarding [PATCH 0/2] Fix prosody system test
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
69731: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=69731
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH 0/2] Fix prosody system test
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:57:02 +1100
>
>
>
>
> In a previous patch[1], Liliana found that the prosody system test was
> failing. I did some investigation, and found that this was because the
> saslauth module doesn't allow PLAIN or LOGIN authentication on insecure
> connections.
>
> There is a configuration item for this, but we didn't have it as a part of the
> Guix prosody-configuration objects, so I added it and then used it to make the
> test pass.
>
> [1]: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/69272#10
>
> Carlo Zancanaro (2):
>   gnu: services: Add insecure-sasl-mechanisms to prosody configuration.
>   gnu: tests: Fix prosody system test.
>
>  doc/guix.texi              | 12 +++++++++---
>  gnu/services/messaging.scm |  6 ++++++
>  gnu/tests/messaging.scm    |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 2a8018e42c0d9b81de56cf322043c797e443c267
> -- 
> 2.41.0
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: [bug#69731] [PATCH 0/2] Fix prosody system test
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 17 Mar 2024 13:29:27 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Evolution 3.46.4 
>
>
>
>
> Am Dienstag, dem 12.03.2024 um 12:01 +1100 schrieb Carlo Zancanaro:
> > On Mon, Mar 11 2024, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> > > Nice catch.  Would you also like to submit tests for the modules in
> > > 69272?
> > 
> > I'm not sure how to test them. I had a look at the Freetalk API, but
> > it doesn't seem like it supports any of the XMPP features that those
> > extra modules add. We'd need to use a different client (or send raw
> > XML stanzas) to poke prosody in the right ways.
> > 
> > I'm not prepared to do that amount of exploratory work right now.
> Fair enough, I pushed what you already have.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> --- End Message ---