--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
[PATCH] doc: Correct the "guix package --install-from-expression" example. |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:00:15 +0100 |
* doc/guix.texi (Invoking @command{guix package}): Correct the module where
'guile-final' is defined. It is actually located in (gnu packages
commencement) rather than in the (gnu packages base).
Change-Id: I7747106916d53dcbe296b7302983c5013eb2926d
---
doc/guix.texi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index 858d5751bf..4ab9a7663c 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -3445,7 +3445,7 @@ Invoking guix package
@var{exp} must be a Scheme expression that evaluates to a
@code{<package>} object. This option is notably useful to disambiguate
between same-named variants of a package, with expressions such as
-@code{(@@ (gnu packages base) guile-final)}.
+@code{(@@ (gnu packages commencement) guile-final)}.
Note that this option installs the first output of the specified
package, which may be insufficient when needing a specific output of a
base-commit: 447e9c96259e8fa15a828de9b2dd3400e2ffafe6
--
2.41.0
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug#69750] [PATCH] doc: Correct the "guix package --install-from-expression" example. |
|
Date: |
Sat, 16 Mar 2024 22:40:20 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.10.8; emacs 29.1 |
Rostislav Svoboda <rostislav.svoboda@gmail.com> writes:
> * doc/guix.texi (Invoking @command{guix package}): Correct the module where
> 'guile-final' is defined. It is actually located in (gnu packages
> commencement) rather than in the (gnu packages base).
>
> Change-Id: I7747106916d53dcbe296b7302983c5013eb2926d
> ---
> doc/guix.texi | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thanks! I've pushed this to master as
4fe9aae225fa4ee0416d7cfa984bda8fcded8436.
Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---