emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#69017: closed (30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#69017: closed (30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 05:52:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2024 21:50:36 -0800
with message-id <87ttm9q7o3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
and subject line Re: bug#69017: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step 
optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #69017,
regarding 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in 
debbugs-gnu-apply-patch
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
69017: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=69017
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 09:42:57 -0800 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
I've started using `debbugs-gnu-apply-patch' regularly, and find it
enormously useful -- it's particularly nice that it handles both inline
patches and attachments.

I don't love the automatic compilation step, though. I pretty much never
want to go straight to compilation; it is very long; and the windows are
a mess until it finishes. Even the magit/vc step afterwards is often not
what I want, as I have Magit already open on Emacs somewhere else.

How about some sort of custom option to control this? Either
specifically compile-after-apply, or maybe a list of post-apply-actions,
something like that?

Thanks,
Eric



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#69017: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 21:50:36 -0800 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de> writes:

> Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
>>> Looks OK in general. You need to adapt the :type of
>>> debbugs-gnu-compile-command, and also to add some few words about in
>>> debbugs-ug.texi.
>>
>> Sounds good, I'll do those things and close this up later today. Thanks!
>
> If there's nothing else to do, you might also increase the version in
> debbugs.el to 0.40.

Done! Thanks.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]