--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[Hanno Perrey] [ELPA] New package: jami-bot and org-jami-bot |
Date: |
Sat, 3 Feb 2024 17:42:52 -0500 |
Package: elpa
(Moving this also from emacs-devel.)
I think we still have to add org-jami-bot. Are there any blockers, or
is it ready to go in?
-------------------- Start of forwarded message --------------------
From: Hanno Perrey <hanno@hoowl.se>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: [ELPA] New package: jami-bot and org-jami-bot
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 12:21:42 +0100
Hej,
I would like to propose two tightly-coupled packages for inclusion into
ELPA: jami-bot and org-jami-bot.
jami-bot is an extendable chat bot for the distributed, private
messenger Jami. It interacts with the locally-installed Jami daemon via
D-Bus and reacts to both plain text messages and file transfers sent to
local accounts.
org-jami-bot builds upon jami-bot and extends it with Org mode capture
functionality for text messages and images. It allows to schedule agenda
items at specific dates, compose multi-measure captures and capture
images -- all by sending a message via the GNU Jami messenger.
I would like to keep maintaining both packages at their current
repositories:
- https://gitlab.com/hperrey/jami-bot
- https://gitlab.com/hperrey/org-jami-bot
I have signed the copyright paperwork with the FSF already and changed
the copyright in the respective files for both packages.
As this is the first time I am proposing a package for ELPA, any
guidance on the process and feedback would be highly welcome!
Thanks and cheers,
Hanno
--
Hanno Perrey
https://hoowl.se
-------------------- End of forwarded message --------------------
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#68916: [Hanno Perrey] [ELPA] New package: jami-bot and org-jami-bot |
Date: |
Sun, 04 Feb 2024 14:23:13 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
>> BTW, for both `jami-bot` and `org-jami-bot` it would be nice if the
>> `.gitignore` could be adjusted to account for ELPA-generated files,
>> as in the patch below.
> Done.
Thanks.
> I have not bumped the version number though as this was the only
> change, let me know in case I should.
No need, indeed.
Stefan
--- End Message ---