emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#67719: closed ([PATCH 0/3] GMIC, Darktable updates)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#67719: closed ([PATCH 0/3] GMIC, Darktable updates)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:57:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:55:37 +0000
with message-id <87jznyhs8f.fsf@protonmail.com>
and subject line Re: update darktable version
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #67719,
regarding [PATCH 0/3] GMIC, Darktable updates
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
67719: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=67719
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 0/3] GMIC, Darktable updates Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 22:20:17 +0000
Vinicius Monego (3):
  gnu: gmic: Update to 3.3.2.
  gnu: darktable: Build with GCC again.
  gnu: darktable: Enable more optional features.

 gnu/packages/image-processing.scm | 16 ++--------------
 gnu/packages/photo.scm            | 21 +++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)


base-commit: 06f25a9a85be1bbe7a709e58ce41c1a834e5f1ae
-- 
2.39.2




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: update darktable version Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:55:37 +0000
Hi Alex,

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 06:15 PM, Alex Devaure wrote:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> Thank you for your answer. I created the issue #68293 and the
> modification is now on master branch.
> Best regards,
> Alex
>

Looks like Vinicius Monego already did the update in
9c67673d7bb9cdc43c1196b075447b57aff74039 after pushing #67719 starting
with 50731875243428cb11cc17fa712fa8079b307622.

However, both issues were left open, so I'm closing both with this message.

Sorry for any duplicated work and thanks both of you for keeping
Darktable up to date and improving it!

John

> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> Alex Devaure <ajadevaure@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> There is a new version of the RAW developer darktable. The patch #67719
>>> modifies the generation of it by replacing clang with gcc. The patch is
>>> not yet merged, should I base my patch (updating darktable version) to
>>> #67719?
>>
>> That'd be fine, yes.



--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]