emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#68574: closed ([PATCH] gnu: gnome-shell-extension-paperwm: Update to


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#68574: closed ([PATCH] gnu: gnome-shell-extension-paperwm: Update to 44.17.0.)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 08:52:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 09:50:55 +0100
with message-id <6da2b76c0bc7a2832bc276def4fc2d12f745dc45.camel@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [PATCH] gnu: gnome-shell-extension-paperwm: Update to 
44.17.0.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #68574,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: gnome-shell-extension-paperwm: Update to 44.17.0.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
68574: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=68574
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnome-shell-extension-paperwm: Update to 44.17.0. Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:41:14 -0500
Hi. paperwm was not working. I updated it to v44.17.0 which is the
latest release supporting our version of gnome (42)

Cheers.

Attachment: 0001-gnu-gnome-shell-extension-paperwm-Update-to-44.17.0.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: gnome-shell-extension-paperwm: Update to 44.17.0. Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 09:50:55 +0100 User-agent: Evolution 3.46.4
Hi,

Am Samstag, dem 20.01.2024 um 00:22 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus:
> Hello!
> 
> Thank you for your patch! How convenient, 44.17.0 is also the latest
> version that works on GNOME 44, which is being worked on over at
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68556
> 
> Since you update the package, maybe it could be the right time to
> update the packaging style also. There are 3 things that you could
> change:
> 
> - convert the 'arguments field to a list of G-Expressions;
> - remove the #t at the end of the 'compile-schemas phase;
> - remove the package label in native-inputs.
> 
> Aside from that, I see no problem with your patch.
I've pushed the original version, followed by a style update that
incorporates both of your fixes.  I hope that's fine.

Cheers


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]