--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH core-updates] gnu: coreutils: Skip tests which are broken on btrfs |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jul 2023 17:55:16 -0700 |
When building coreutils on a BTRFS filesystem, this test case
consistently fails.
* gnu/packages/base.scm (coreutils): Skip tests/cp/reflink-auto.sh
---
gnu/packages/base.scm | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/base.scm b/gnu/packages/base.scm
index 1fdfaf8a57..a9dab0b30f 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/base.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/base.scm
@@ -464,7 +464,11 @@ (define-public coreutils
;; there might be some environmental factor
;; here
((" test-tls\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) ") " ")))
- '())
+ '((substitute*
+ ;; This test fails on BTRFS
+ '("tests/cp/reflink-auto.sh")
+ (("^#!.*" all)
+ (string-append all "exit 77;\n")))))
(substitute* "Makefile.in"
;; fails on filesystems where inotify cannot be used,
;; more info in #47935
--
2.37.2
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#64779: [PATCH core-updates] gnu: coreutils: Skip tests which are broken on btrfs |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Jan 2024 21:47:11 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
tags 64779 + unreproducible
quit
Hi,
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Ryan Sundberg <ryan@arctype.co> writes:
>
>> When building coreutils on a BTRFS filesystem, this test case
>> consistently fails.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/base.scm (coreutils): Skip tests/cp/reflink-auto.sh
>> ---
>> gnu/packages/base.scm | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/base.scm b/gnu/packages/base.scm
>> index 1fdfaf8a57..a9dab0b30f 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/base.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/base.scm
>> @@ -464,7 +464,11 @@ (define-public coreutils
>> ;; there might be some environmental factor
>> ;; here
>> ((" test-tls\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) ") " ")))
>> - '())
>> + '((substitute*
>> + ;; This test fails on BTRFS
>> + '("tests/cp/reflink-auto.sh")
>> + (("^#!.*" all)
>> + (string-append all "exit 77;\n")))))
>
> Could you please report the issue to upstream, and add a comment with a
> reference to the open issue?
I've searched the upstream issue tracker, and found none about this.
I've built coreutils 9.1 and latest master from source on my Btrfs
machine, which ran the test suite fine. I've also rebuilt the current
Guix coreutils package with success on the same machine.
I don't think the problem is with Btrfs, or at least it's not easy to
reproduce.
Closing for now.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
--- End Message ---