bug#66241: closed (30.0.50; [PATCH] Use auth-info-mode for non-hidden authinfo and netrc files)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:08:12 -0800
with message-id 
<CADwFkm=8F+4XkvsgGKPaAe-zepjA5TJP8Y26JjKyXEZ+0UtFSQ@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#66241: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Use auth-info-mode for 
non-hidden authinfo and netrc files
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #66241,
regarding 30.0.50; [PATCH] Use auth-info-mode for non-hidden authinfo and netrc 
files
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
66241: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=66241
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Use auth-info-mode for non-hidden authinfo and netrc files Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 18:44:58 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

See patch for the rationale.

0001-Use-auth-info-mode-for-non-hidden-authinfo-and-netrc.patch
Description: Text Data

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#66241: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Use auth-info-mode for non-hidden authinfo and netrc files
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:08:12 -0800
>
>
>
>
> Version: 30.1
>
> Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 at 19:34, Stefan Kangas wrote:
> >
> >> Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >>> See patch for the rationale.
> >>
> >> Thanks.  Could you explain why you think that this should this be the
> >> default value, instead of merely a user customization?
> >
> > The user customization is indeed rather easy: one can add a "-*- mode:"
> > comment at the top of the file.  The main issue with that is that the
> > user needs to be aware of the existence of the mode.  I wasn't, until
> > recently.
> >
> > The second point is, I see no potential for false-positives, i.e., who
> > would have a file name "authinfo" or "netrc" that is not a credentials
> > file?  (Of course this is just a theory which can be disputed.)
>
> Thanks, that makes sense.  So I installed this patch on master
> (c12166de380).
>
> I'm closing this bug report.
>
>
> --- End Message ---