bug#67625: closed (Subject: [PATCH] gnu: LLVM, Clang, libomp, lld: Update to 17.0.6.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 10 Dec 2023 12:18:03 +0800
with message-id <87o7eyk7wk.wl-hako@ultrarare.space>
and subject line Re: [bug#67625] Subject: [PATCH] gnu: LLVM, Clang, libomp, 
lld: Update to 17.0.6.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #67625,
regarding Subject: [PATCH] gnu: LLVM, Clang, libomp, lld: Update to 17.0.6.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
67625: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=67625
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: LLVM, Clang, libomp, lld: Update to 17.0.6.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 4 Dec 2023 16:20:15 +0000
>
>
>
>
> >From 52ca0b1749fcb845f8015a33364beae489c08bf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: fanquake <fanquake@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 14:07:15 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: LLVM, Clang, libomp, lld: Update to 17.0.6.
>
> * gnu/packages/llvm.scm (llvm-17, clang-17, libomp-17, lld-17):
> Update to 17.0.6.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/llvm.scm | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/llvm.scm b/gnu/packages/llvm.scm
> index 56e2279f69..610020b5c5 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/llvm.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/llvm.scm
> @@ -603,13 +603,13 @@ (define %llvm-monorepo-hashes
>    '(("14.0.6" . "14f8nlvnmdkp9a9a79wv67jbmafvabczhah8rwnqrgd5g3hfxxxx")
>      ("15.0.7" . "12sggw15sxq1krh1mfk3c1f07h895jlxbcifpwk3pznh4m1rjfy2")
>      ("16.0.6" . "0jxmapg7shwkl88m4mqgfjv4ziqdmnppxhjz6vz51ycp2x4nmjky")
> -    ("17.0.5" . "149flpr96vcn7a1ckya6mm93m9yp85l47w156fjd0r99ydxrw5kv")))
> +    ("17.0.6" . "1a7rq3rgw5vxm8y39fyzr4kv7w97lli4a0c1qrkchwk8p0n07hgh")))
>
>  (define %llvm-patches
>    '(("14.0.6" . ("clang-14.0-libc-search-path.patch"))
>      ("15.0.7" . ("clang-15.0-libc-search-path.patch"))
>      ("16.0.6" . ("clang-16.0-libc-search-path.patch"))
> -    ("17.0.5" . ("clang-17.0-libc-search-path.patch"))))
> +    ("17.0.6" . ("clang-17.0-libc-search-path.patch"))))
>
>  (define (llvm-monorepo version)
>    (origin
> @@ -1502,7 +1502,7 @@ (define-public clang-toolchain-16
>  (define-public llvm-17
>    (package
>      (inherit llvm-15)
> -    (version "17.0.5")
> +    (version "17.0.6")
>      (source (llvm-monorepo version))))
>
>  (define-public clang-runtime-17
> -- 
> 2.43.0
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: [bug#67625] Subject: [PATCH] gnu: LLVM, Clang, libomp, lld: Update to 17.0.6.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 10 Dec 2023 12:18:03 +0800
>
>
>
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Tue, 05 Dec 2023 18:49:29 +0800,
> Michael Ford wrote:
> >
> > It should. Forgot about this, and then only built LLVM, not a full
> > Clang toolchain.
> > Have done that now. Updated patch below:
> >
> > From 10fa8bf8d5eeebdb4fcf0142617af2f54e43beb5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: fanquake <fanquake@gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 14:07:15 +0000
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: LLVM, Clang, libomp, lld: Update to 17.0.6.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/llvm.scm (llvm-17, clang-17, libomp-17, lld-17):
> > Update to 17.0.6.
> > ---
> >  gnu/packages/llvm.scm | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>
> Applied as 2e11caff39d502775d7c652972a441f5da3d9eec, thank you!
>
>
> > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 18:41, Greg Hogan <code@greghogan.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 11:21 AM Michael Ford <fanquake@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From 52ca0b1749fcb845f8015a33364beae489c08bf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: fanquake <fanquake@gmail.com>
> > > > Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 14:07:15 +0000
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: LLVM, Clang, libomp, lld: Update to 17.0.6.
> > > >
> > > > * gnu/packages/llvm.scm (llvm-17, clang-17, libomp-17, lld-17):
> > > > Update to 17.0.6.
> > > > ---
> > > >  gnu/packages/llvm.scm | 6 +++---
> > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> [...]
> > >
> > > Should this also update the clang-tools-extra hash?
>
> And thanks to Greg for the review!
>
>
> --- End Message ---