emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#67714: closed (“guix build racket” different from “guix shell racket


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#67714: closed (“guix build racket” different from “guix shell racket”)
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2023 18:35:02 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 8 Dec 2023 19:33:49 +0100
with message-id 
<CAJ3okZ3vwSqbT7AVLenkegYYN99U_PBxPxFMA0H4JA_i47CwvQ@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#67714: “guix build racket” different from “guix shell 
racket”
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #67714,
regarding “guix build racket” different from “guix shell racket”
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
67714: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=67714
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: “guix build racket” different from “guix shell racket” Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2023 17:45:09 +0100
Hi,

Using Guix aabfddb (Oct 2023),

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix build racket-minimal --no-grafts -d
/gnu/store/hcdvhp36c51f6854mzggacsylkks24jj-racket-minimal-8.10.drv
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix shell racket-minimal --no-grafts --dry-run
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
The following derivations would be built:
  /gnu/store/vy5y76f25ni3kxjfa8x6c3rjgvrvach1-profile.drv
  /gnu/store/jxbm1inf8mj7fvs8z9xxxcrlqv9i1hs7-racket-minimal-8.10.drv
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Well, the derivations are not the same and their output neither.

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix build /gnu/store/hcdvhp36c51f6854mzggacsylkks24jj-racket-minimal-8.10.drv
/gnu/store/rvvyiy90dh2dpwn52r84xx4rsvvijz8q-racket-minimal-8.10

$ guix build /gnu/store/jxbm1inf8mj7fvs8z9xxxcrlqv9i1hs7-racket-minimal-8.10.drv
/gnu/store/f2vky2mswm2h7w3jjiw7s28d25kzbmrl-racket-minimal-8.10
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Hum?!  Looking more closely, their builder reads,

>From “guix build”:

  (apply invoke racket
  "/gnu/store/xgaj5m1yhyrc80jhx9djsvg4r7lgrz05-configure-layer.rkt"

>From “guix shell”:

  (apply invoke racket
  "/gnu/store/3k9f2j9arycxd5r6fw1dpidj51pbv41n-configure-layer.rkt"

And the bug is:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ diff \
  /gnu/store/xgaj5m1yhyrc80jhx9djsvg4r7lgrz05-configure-layer.rkt \
  /gnu/store/3k9f2j9arycxd5r6fw1dpidj51pbv41n-configure-layer.rkt
diff: /gnu/store/xgaj5m1yhyrc80jhx9djsvg4r7lgrz05-configure-layer.rkt: No such 
file or directory
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Well, on more more recent revisions, e.g., 06f25a9a85, I am not able to
reproduce.  Other said, I am not able to tell if the bug had been fixed
or if it is not hit.

Cheers,
simon




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#67714: “guix build racket” different from “guix shell racket” Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 19:33:49 +0100
Hi Ludo,

On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 19:08, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> This is likely <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66662>, fixed on Oct. 27th
> with commit 67effc1560fc175dfbcb58ef5b965b08b3942d6c.

Cool!  Thanks for the quick answer.  You saved me some investigation time. :-)

> I guess we can close if it’s not reproducible now?

Yeah, done.

Cheers,
simon


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]