bug#66848: closed ([PATCH] gnu: sbcl-cl-webkit: Update to 3.5.10.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2023 18:26:11 +0000
with message-id <87h6m0jbt2.fsf@cbaines.net>
and subject line Re: [bug#66848] [PATCH] gnu: sbcl-cl-webkit: Update to 3.5.10.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #66848,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: sbcl-cl-webkit: Update to 3.5.10.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
66848: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=66848
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH] gnu: sbcl-cl-webkit: Update to 3.5.10.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 31 Oct 2023 18:25:42 +0400 From ac7c723d9b1c23b65907a500531194b44df56ea0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>
>
>
>
> gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm (sbcl-cl-webkit): Update to 3.5.10.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm
> index 692142e4a8..4743e39d93 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm
> @@ -5044,7 +5044,7 @@ (define-public ecl-cl-cffi-gtk
>  (define-public sbcl-cl-webkit
>    (package
>      (name "sbcl-cl-webkit")
> -    (version "3.5.9")
> +    (version "3.5.10")
>      (source
>       (origin
>         (method git-fetch)
> @@ -5054,7 +5054,7 @@ (define-public sbcl-cl-webkit
>         (file-name (git-file-name "cl-webkit" version))
>         (sha256
>          (base32
> -         "00h61p5mrvvbycp703isy0wvgqlfb7k0cidw4vg75y7s29m3k6k0"))))
> +         "0bn8idvbi58kg0g76lanvjzkgnkcy41yn9vbp7f80q9fa7w892rq"))))
>      (build-system asdf-build-system/sbcl)
>      (inputs
>       `(("cffi" ,sbcl-cffi)
> -- 
> 2.41.0
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#66848] [PATCH] gnu: sbcl-cl-webkit: Update to 3.5.10. Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2023 18:26:11 +0000 User-agent: mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 29.1

Artyom Bologov <mail@aartaka.me> writes:

>>The author date is a bit confusing to me, did you author this in 2001?
>
> No, I didn't 😥 Should I resubmit?

No worries, I've reset the author date and gone ahead and pushed this to
master as 04cb25ab9e58455d01900b8ae6c15400ddd81135.

Thanks,

Chris

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---