bug#66250: closed ([PATCH] doc: Document specification->package+output.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:53:19 +0300
with message-id <ZSkFf5gkdSN9nxzU@3900XT>
and subject line Re: [PATCH] doc: Document specification->package+output.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #66250,
regarding [PATCH] doc: Document specification->package+output.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
66250: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=66250
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH] doc: Document specification->package+output.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 28 Sep 2023 12:32:58 +0300
>
>
>
>
> Reported by nutcase on IRC.
>
> * doc/guix.texi (Using the Configuration System): Add a section about
> using specification->package+output.
> ---
>  doc/guix.texi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
> index f49ed894a7..d9865f4ac0 100644
> --- a/doc/guix.texi
> +++ b/doc/guix.texi
> @@ -16936,6 +16936,23 @@ Using the Configuration System
>                      %base-packages)))
>  @end lisp
>  
> +@findex specification->package+output
> +When a package has more than one output it can be a challenge to refer to
> +specific output instead of just to the standard @code{out} output.  For these
> +situations one can use the @code{specification->package+output} procedure from
> +the @code{(gnu packages)} module.  For example:
> +
> +@lisp
> +(use-modules (gnu packages))
> +
> +(operating-system
> +  ;; ...
> +  (packages (append (map specification->package+output
> +                         '("nss-certs" "git" "git:send-email"))
> +                    %base-packages)))
> +
> +@end lisp
> +
>  @unnumberedsubsec System Services
>  
>  @cindex services
>
> -- 
> Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
> GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
> Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: Document specification->package+output. Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:53:19 +0300

Patch pushed.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---