emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#66406: closed (Broken `re-search-forward' (?))


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#66406: closed (Broken `re-search-forward' (?))
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 02:29:02 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 09 Oct 2023 05:28:00 +0300
with message-id <83zg0swmvj.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#66406: Broken `re-search-forward' (?)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #66406,
regarding Broken `re-search-forward' (?)
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
66406: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=66406
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Broken `re-search-forward' (?) Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2023 12:35:47 +0200
In a recent Emacs master (as provided in Silex's Docker image):

$ emacs --batch --eval "(with-temp-buffer (insert \"\n;;;###autoload\n(defun ...)\n\") (goto-char 1) (print (re-search-forward \"^[[:space:]]*;;;###autoload[[:space:]]*$\" nil t)))"

Prints nil.

With every stable version of Emacs I have this prints 16.

Paul

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#66406: Broken `re-search-forward' (?) Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 05:28:00 +0300
> Cc: 66406@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2023 22:06:23 +0200
> 
> > > In a recent Emacs master (as provided in Silex's Docker image):
> >
> > Any chance of knowing which commit precisely?
> 
> Not really, if you evaluate `emacs-repository-version' on 
> Silex-image-packaged Emacs, result is nil.
> As far as I know, they are just built from Emacs VCS snapshot tarballs, but 
> exact commit hash is lost
> in the build process.  This was even discussed before:
> https://github.com/Silex/docker-emacs/issues/86#issuecomment-1234266607 I 
> don't know the
> details, but apparently GNU provides the snapshots ("archive tarballs are 
> downloaded and
> unpacked"), so you could just inject revision number in the proper place and 
> then get better bug
> reports. I'd provide commit number if I knew it somehow.
> 
> > I get 16 with today's master as well
> 
> Then it is apparently fixed already.

I also get 16, so I presume this bug was already fixed, and I'm
closing it.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]