bug#66403: closed ([PATCH] Use delete-all-overlays in clean-mode)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 08 Oct 2023 14:40:54 +0300
with message-id <83o7h9xry1.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#66404: [PATCH] Use delete-all-overlays in clean-mode
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #66404,
regarding [PATCH] Use delete-all-overlays in clean-mode
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
66404: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=66404
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] Use delete-all-overlays in clean-mode Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 02:57:25 -0700

Tags: patch

Is there a reason to use dolist instead of delete-all-overlays?

0001-Use-delete-all-overlays-in-clean-mode.patch
Description: Text Data

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#66404: [PATCH] Use delete-all-overlays in clean-mode
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 08 Oct 2023 14:40:54 +0300
>
>
>
>
> > From: Joseph Turner <joseph@breatheoutbreathe.in>
> > Cc: 66404@debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 03:32:40 -0700
> > 
> > 
> > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> > 
> > >> Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 02:58:45 -0700
> > >> From:  Joseph Turner via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> > >>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
> > >>
> > >> Is there a reason to use dolist instead of delete-all-overlays?
> > >
> > > Already asked.
> > 
> > Oops! Sorry, please close this.
>
> Done.
>
> > (Is there a way for me to close my own issues?)
>
> Yes, see admin/notes/bugtracker.
>
>
> --- End Message ---