bug#63627: closed (Improve plstore.el and fix various issues of it)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Sep 2023 14:07:31 +0300
with message-id <837coqidfw.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#63627: Improve plstore.el and fix various issues of it
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #63627,
regarding Improve plstore.el and fix various issues of it
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
63627: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=63627
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Improve plstore.el and fix various issues of it
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 21 May 2023 17:45:39 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0
>
>
>
>
> Placeholder bug for a number of patches related to plstore.el, hopefully 
> soon to follow.  Please leave open for the time being.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#63627: Improve plstore.el and fix various issues of it
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 16 Sep 2023 14:07:31 +0300
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2023 12:35:51 +0200
> > Cc: 63627@debbugs.gnu.org
> > From: Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de>
> > 
> > On 2023-09-16  12:13, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > >> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 23:24:54 +0200
> > >> Cc: 63627@debbugs.gnu.org
> > >> From: Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de>
> > >>
> > >> Please consider for committing on emacs-29.
> > > 
> > > Thanks, but did you mean to say this should not be subsequently merged
> > > to master?  If so, you should tell that in the commit log message.
> > 
> > No, this should go to both emacs-29 and (by "automatic" subsequent
> > merging) also to master.
>
> Thanks, installed on the emacs-29 branch, and closing the bug.
>
> > Sorry, I thought that was the default.
>
> It is indeed the default, but the non-trivial changes and something
> you said about "only emacs-29 bugs" made me doubt that.
>
>
> --- End Message ---