emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#51749: closed (29.0.50; Emacs 29 Creates Only Emacsclient Icon in Ub


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#51749: closed (29.0.50; Emacs 29 Creates Only Emacsclient Icon in Ubuntu Dock)
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2023 08:51:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 3 Sep 2023 01:50:02 -0700
with message-id 
<CADwFkmnyZb6MaBoDn501pJRaST7OoUce020SHCTNJoh9b07a5Q@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#51749: 29.0.50; Emacs 29 Creates Only Emacsclient Icon 
in Ubuntu Dock
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #51749,
regarding 29.0.50; Emacs 29 Creates Only Emacsclient Icon in Ubuntu Dock
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
51749: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=51749
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: 29.0.50; Emacs 29 Creates Only Emacsclient Icon in Ubuntu Dock Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:11:44 +0100 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
Could it be related to bug #49505?

--
Manuel Uberti
www.manueluberti.eu



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#51749: 29.0.50; Emacs 29 Creates Only Emacsclient Icon in Ubuntu Dock Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 01:50:02 -0700
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver@mavit.org.uk> writes:
>
>>> Ideally there would be a "semi-daemon"
>>> mode, which is in between the daemon mode and the normal mode: The
>>> first invocation launches a daemon, further invocations (e.g., using
>>> emacsclient, or dbus) would just create new frames BUT if you close the
>>> last frame, no daemon will stay around. This would exactly match the
>>> behavior of other desktop applications.
>>
>> We have this behaviour in Emacs 29.  To get it, a user has to opt-in
>> by calling function server-stop-automatically.
>
> I've only lightly skimmed this bug report -- does this mean that this
> bug report can be closed?

More information was requested, but none was given within ~10 months, so
I'm closing this bug.  If this is still an issue, please reply to this
email (use "Reply to all" in your email client) and we can reopen the
bug report.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]