emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#64590: closed (Patch: fix gud-go in gdb-mi.el)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#64590: closed (Patch: fix gud-go in gdb-mi.el)
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 08:43:02 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 15 Jul 2023 11:42:36 +0300
with message-id <83lefhd0qr.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#64590: Patch: fix gud-go in gdb-mi.el
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #64590,
regarding Patch: fix gud-go in gdb-mi.el
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
64590: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=64590
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Patch: fix gud-go in gdb-mi.el Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 12:40:58 +0800
Hi,
document of gud-go says "Start or continue execution.  Use a prefix to
specify arguments." but it always prompts for program arguments
regardless of whether "C-u" is pressed because arg is numeric prefix
here. The attachment is a patch to change gud-go just prompts if
prefix is not 1.

Attachment: gud-go.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#64590: Patch: fix gud-go in gdb-mi.el Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 11:42:36 +0300
> From: Wang Diancheng <dianchengwang@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 11:06:32 +0800
> Cc: 64590@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> 于2023年7月13日周四 16:58写道:
> >
> > > From: Wang Diancheng <dianchengwang@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 12:40:58 +0800
> > >
> > > document of gud-go says "Start or continue execution.  Use a prefix to
> > > specify arguments." but it always prompts for program arguments
> > > regardless of whether "C-u" is pressed because arg is numeric prefix
> > > here.
> >
> > Right, gud-def specifies '(interactive "p")'.
> >
> > > The attachment is a patch to change gud-go just prompts if
> > > prefix is not 1.
> >
> > This will have the subtlety that "C-u 1 C-v" will fail to ask for
> > program arguments.  Shouldn't we instead look at current-prefix-arg?
> >
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Yes, I think it's a good idea. the patch is updated as that.

Thanks, installed on the emacs-29 branch, and closing the bug.

With this contribution, you have exhausted the amount of changes we
can accept from you without a copyright assignment.  Would you like to
start the legal paperwork of assigning to the FSF the copyright for
your changes, so that we could in the future accept more contributions
from you without limitations?  If yes, I will send you the form to
fill.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]