bug#64014: closed ('guix pack -R' breaks bubblewrap)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2023 23:30:07 +0200
with message-id <87mt0378v4.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#64014: guix pack regression
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #64014,
regarding 'guix pack -R' breaks bubblewrap
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
64014: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=64014
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> guix pack regression 
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 12 Jun 2023 15:59:25 +0300
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hello Guix,
>
> I've produced a guix pack with the same command that I've always used
> (which includes passing the -RR flag), but I now get the following
> message:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> bwrap: No permissions to creating new namespace, likely because the kernel does 
> not allow non-privileged user namespaces. On e.g. debian this can be enabled 
> with 'sysctl kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone=1'.
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Any ideas?  Thanks.
>
>
> Guix version:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>   guix f36b8a9
>     repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
>     branch: master
>     commit: f36b8a9763087d2b9d3705595fbc34b054297ab8
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> -- 
> André A. Gomes
> "You cannot even find the ruins..."
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#64014: guix pack regression
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 10 Jul 2023 23:30:07 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> André A. Gomes <andremegafone@gmail.com> skribis:
>
> > Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> >
> >> Yes, that’d be great.  If you still have that older pack that didn’t
> >> have the problem, you could also run it under ‘strace -f -o
> >> /tmp/log.strace’ to see what happens before the failure.
> >
> > Ludovic, I didn't reach any meaningful conclusion.  Please close this
> > issue.  Thanks.
>
> Done!
>
>
> --- End Message ---