bug#24083: closed (guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 31 Mar 2023 12:57:12 -0400
with message-id <87edp4x3iv.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #24083,
regarding guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
24083: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=24083
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:25:02 +0200
>
>
>
>
> guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors.
>
> $ guix lint perl-io-socket-inet6 ; echo $?
> ;;; note: source file /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/networking.scm
> ;;;       newer than compiled /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/networking.go
> ;;; note: source file /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/mail.scm
> ;;;       newer than compiled /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/mail.go
> ;;; note: source file /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/ldc.scm
> ;;;       newer than compiled /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/ldc.go
> gnu/packages/networking.scm:437:1: perl-io-socket-inet6-2.72: line 464 is way 
> too long (96 characters)
> gnu/packages/networking.scm:437:1: perl-io-socket-inet6-2.72: line 483 is way 
> too long (92 characters)
> 0
> ^--- ooops
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 31 Mar 2023 12:57:12 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:05:49 +0200
> > zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 22:57, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> >> > Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> skribis:
> >> >  
> >> >> guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors.  
> >> >
> >> > It never pretended to exit with non-zero when warnings are emitted.  :-)
> >> > (These are warnings, not errors.)  
> >
> > Sure, it makes sense.  I'm just doing " |wc -l" now.
> >
> >> Because of that, I propose to close without modifying the returned code.
> >> WDYT?
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > But I would suggest to document in the manual that the exit status is
> > not set,  though.
>
> Acting on the proposed and agreed closing action :-).
>
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Maxim
>
>
> --- End Message ---