Hi Guix Team,
tl;dr;
The recipe for package 'chez-scheme-for-racket-bootstrap-bootfiles' (a
dependency for racket-8.*) needs to use the –machine flag to build on aarch64
(and possibly also ppc32, the other non-x86 architectures supported by the
Racket fork of Chez Scheme). I therefore suggest the attached patch to make
building and using Racket possible on aarch64 Guix.
End of tl;dr;
A few weeks ago I wanted to use Racket on Guix on aarch64, but was made aware,
that Racket was not available as a substitute and it did not build. On the
other hand, recent versions of Racket were available on Raspberry Pi OS which is
explicitly running on aarch64. The machine I am running Guix on actually is a
Raspberry Pi 4B.
So, I dug deeper to find that the problem is that the package
chez-scheme-for-racket-bootstrap-bootfiles
fails with the error
string-append: contract violation
expected: string?
given: #f
argument position: 1st
other arguments...:
".def"
context...:
/tmp/guix-build-chez-scheme-for-racket-bootstrap-bootfiles-9.9.9-pre-release.14.drv-0/source/racket/src/rktboot/machine-def.rkt:6:0: open-file-with-machine.def-redirect
error: in phase 'build': uncaught exception:
%exception #<&invoke-error program: "/gnu/store/0n4skakcg05bbq9sq7g00j2zm25xh4wa-racket-vm-bc-8.8/opt/racket-vm/bin/racket" arguments: ("../rktboot/main.rkt") exit-status: 1 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f>
phase `build' failed after 14.3 seconds
command "/gnu/store/0n4skakcg05bbq9sq7g00j2zm25xh4wa-racket-vm-bc-8.8/opt/racket-vm/bin/racket" "../rktboot/main.rkt" failed with status 1
builder for `/gnu/store/d04mbj02vzjv0ljcqy2lxs33scz7kjz0-chez-scheme-for-racket-bootstrap-bootfiles-9.9.9-pre-release.14.drv' failed with exit code 1
@ build-failed /gnu/store/d04mbj02vzjv0ljcqy2lxs33scz7kjz0-chez-scheme-for-racket-bootstrap-bootfiles-9.9.9-pre-release.14.drv - 1 builder for `/gnu/store/d04mbj02vzjv0ljcqy2lxs33scz7kjz0-chez-scheme-for-racket-bootstrap-bootfiles-9.9.9-pre-release.14.drv' failed with exit code 1
(see, e.g. the build 442314 on ci.guix.gnu.org).
The Racket fork of Chez is natively supported on aarch64, which is supported by
comments in module (gnu packages chez), so I went on to find that machine
architecture is communicated in the build process by setting the environment
variable MACH. I haven't looked to verify this, but it seems that this
environment variable is normally set to a guessed value by the zuo build process
(zuo for 'make' in Mandarin?).
The Guix build recipe for chez-scheme-for-racket-bootstrap-bootfiles, though, is
not configuring the whole downloaded racket source package but takes the
shortcut of just building ChezScheme in the subdirectory
racket/src/ChezScheme
using the Racket utility
../rktboot/main.rkt
This script would actually accept the flag '–machine' and would set the
environment variable MACH to the value of the argument following the flag.
The problem is that in the case of aarch64 the recipe would not set the flag.
In the recipe for chez-scheme-for-racket-bootstrap-bootfiles in module (gnu
packages chez), we find the lines
#~(invoke (search-input-file (or native-inputs inputs) "/opt/racket-vm/bin/racket") "../rktboot/main.rkt" #$@(if (racket-cs-native-supported-system?) #~() (let ((m (nix-system->pbarch-machine-type))) #~("--machine" #$m)))))))))))))
and, since (racket-cs-native-supported-system?) returns tarm64le, the first
branch of the if _expression_ is taken, ommitting the flag.
I suggest to change the above code to the following:
#~(invoke (search-input-file (or native-inputs inputs) "/opt/racket-vm/bin/racket") "../rktboot/main.rkt" #$@(let ((m (or (racket-cs-native-supported-system?) (nix-system->pbarch-machine-type)))) #~("--machine" #$m))))))))))))
which sets the flag for natively supported architectures and those supported by
portable bytecode.
The package (and subsequently Racket) builds on aarch64, the build on x86_64
seems to be unaffected.
It is a simple change which would make a huge difference for Guix users who want
to be able to play with Racket on an aarch64 machine.
Cheers
Tim
Lá Fhéile Pádraig sona dhaoibh!
