emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#62256: closed (28.2; Invalid edebug spec gv-define-simple-setter)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#62256: closed (28.2; Invalid edebug spec gv-define-simple-setter)
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 11:41:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2023 14:40:04 +0300
with message-id <83tty7agh7.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#62256: 28.2; Invalid edebug spec 
gv-define-simple-setter
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #62256,
regarding 28.2; Invalid edebug spec gv-define-simple-setter
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
62256: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=62256
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 28.2; Invalid edebug spec gv-define-simple-setter Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2023 14:25:10 +0100
Insert

(gv-define-simple-setter aref aset)

in a buffer and try to edebug-eval it (C-u C-M-x).

It gives an error which I don't understand, because the second argument
`aset' should match symbolp...

I also tried this on the build from master and the error is the same.

Debugger entered--Lisp error: (invalid-read-syntax "Expected" (&or symbolp 
lambda-expr))
  signal(invalid-read-syntax ("Expected" (&or symbolp lambda-expr)))
  edebug-syntax-error("Expected" (&or symbolp lambda-expr))
  apply(edebug-syntax-error ("Expected" (&or symbolp lambda-expr)))
  edebug-no-match(((aset) (176 . 180) . 181) "Expected" (&or symbolp 
lambda-expr))
  edebug-match-list(((aset) (176 . 180) . 181) (&or symbolp lambda-expr))
  edebug-match-one-spec(((aset) (176 . 180) . 181) (&or symbolp lambda-expr))
  edebug-match-specs(((aset) (176 . 180) . 181) ((&or symbolp lambda-expr) 
&optional sexp) edebug-match-specs)
  edebug-match-specs(((aset) (176 . 180) . 181) (sexp (&or symbolp lambda-expr) 
&optional sexp) edebug-match-specs)
  edebug-match-sublist(((aset) (176 . 180) . 181) (sexp (&or symbolp 
lambda-expr) &optional sexp))
  #f(compiled-function (head cursor) #<bytecode 
0x194f427789f7f1ec>)(gv-define-simple-setter ((aset) (176 . 180) . 181))
  edebug-list-form(((aset) (176 . 180) . 181))
  edebug-form((((gv-define-simple-setter aref aset)) (146 (147 . 170) (171 . 
175) (176 . 180) . 181)))
  edebug-make-form-wrapper((((gv-define-simple-setter aref aset)) (146 (147 . 
170) (171 . 175) (176 . 180) . 181)) 146 181 nil)
  edebug-read-and-maybe-wrap-form1()
  edebug-read-and-maybe-wrap-form()
  edebug--read(read #<buffer *scratch*>)
  apply(edebug--read read #<buffer *scratch*>)

-- 
Best regards,
  Matúš Goljer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#62256: 28.2; Invalid edebug spec gv-define-simple-setter Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 14:40:04 +0300
> From: Matúš Goljer <matus.goljer@gmail.com>
> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 62256@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 13:28:06 +0200
> 
> I was thinking about the form in `(get 'compiler-macro
> 'edebug-declaration-spec)` but actually that one is correct.  It's a bit
> confusing that top level is always wrapped in () even though that list
> wrapper is ignored.
> 
> So in the end there's only this one fix.

Thanks, installed on the emacs-29 branch, and closing the bug.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]