emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#62276: closed (29.0.60; image-minor-mode broken by c-ts-mode)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#62276: closed (29.0.60; image-minor-mode broken by c-ts-mode)
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 18:49:02 +0000

Your message dated Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:46:30 +0200
with message-id <86fs9yj62h.fsf@mail.linkov.net>
and subject line Re: bug#62276: 29.0.60; image-minor-mode broken by c-ts-mode
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #62276,
regarding 29.0.60; image-minor-mode broken by c-ts-mode
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
62276: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=62276
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 29.0.60; image-minor-mode broken by c-ts-mode Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2023 19:36:30 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
0. emacs-29 -Q
1. C-x C-f etc/images/attach.xpm RET
2. C-c C-c toggles from image to C code
3. C-c C-c toggles back from C code to image
4. C-x k RET

Everything works correctly so far.

4. M-: (require 'c-ts-mode) RET
5. C-x C-f etc/images/attach.xpm RET

It's not displayed as an image and C-c C-c does nothing.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#62276: 29.0.60; image-minor-mode broken by c-ts-mode Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:46:30 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
>> >> 4. M-: (require 'c-ts-mode) RET
>> >> 5. C-x C-f etc/images/attach.xpm RET
>> >>
>> >> It's not displayed as an image and C-c C-c does nothing.
>> >
>> > Thanks, should be fixed now on the emacs-29 branch.
>> 
>> Are there other modes that require such ad-hoc hacks?
>
> The ad-hocery was required because files.el itself uses an ugly (and
> undocumented) hack to allow visiting XPM/XBM as either a C file or an
> image file.
>
>> Is there a problem with this pair?
>> 
>>      ("\\.svgz?\\'" . image-mode)
>>      ("\\.svgz?\\'" . xml-mode)
>
> I don't know.  Is there?
>
>> There is only html-ts-mode, not xml-ts-mode?
>
> Yes, at least for now.  I don't think there's a grammar library for
> XML.
>
> Can we close this bug now?

It seems no more fixes are required, so now closing.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]