emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#60833: closed ([PATCH] sh-script.el: Add support for Zsh's case bran


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#60833: closed ([PATCH] sh-script.el: Add support for Zsh's case branches ;|.)
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2023 10:51:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 02 Mar 2023 12:50:27 +0200
with message-id <83h6v3e8b0.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#60833: Acknowledgement ([PATCH] sh-script.el: Add 
support for Zsh's case branches ; |.)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #60833,
regarding [PATCH] sh-script.el: Add support for Zsh's case branches ;|.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
60833: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=60833
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] sh-script.el: Add support for Zsh's case branches ;|. Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 14:28:08 +0100
In shell scripts, case branches traditionally end with ;;. Bash additionally supports case branches ending with ;& and ;;&. Zsh similarly supports case branches ending with ;& and ;|. Currently sh-script.el supports case branches ending with ;;, ;&, and ;;&, but not with ;|. The attached patch adds support for case branches ending with ;|.

I have tested the patch by defining all the modified functions (sh-smie-sh-rules, sh-font-lock-paren) and constants (sh-smie-sh-grammar, sh-smie-rc-grammar, sh-smie--sh-operators, sh-smie--sh-operators-re, sh-smie--sh-operators-back-re) in my .emacs (in a (with-eval-after-load 'sh-script ...) statement).

Here is an example indented without the patch:

case $input in
    *a* ) echo A;;
    *b* ) echo B;&
    *c* ) echo C;;&
    *d* ) echo D;|
*e* ) echo E;;
esac

and with the (simulated) patch:

case $input in
    *a* ) echo A;;
    *b* ) echo B;&
    *c* ) echo C;;&
    *d* ) echo D;|
    *e* ) echo E;;
esac

The first change in the patch replaces an (eq (char-before) ?|) with (and (eq (char-before) ?|) (not (eq (char-before (1- (point))) ?\;))). It is needed to avoid confusing ;| tokens with plain | tokens. I wonder however whether there would be a cleaner way of expressing the same.

The second change replaces a (looking-at ";[;&]\\|\\_<in") with (looking-at ";\\(?:;&?\\|[&|]\\)\\|\\_<in"). The original _expression_ is looking for ;; and ;& tokens but not for ;;& tokens, which looks like an oversight to me. That's why I have changed it to look for ;;, ;&, ;| but also ;;&.

The other changes simply add support for ;| where there was previously support for ;;, ;&, and ;;&.

Philippe

Attachment: 0001-Add-support-for-Zsh-s-case-branches.patch
Description: Source code patch


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#60833: Acknowledgement ([PATCH] sh-script.el: Add support for Zsh's case branches ; |.) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2023 12:50:27 +0200
> From: Philippe Altherr <philippe.altherr@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:20:59 +0100
> 
> Here is an updated patch against the current master branch.

Thanks, installed on master, and closing the bug.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]