bug#61410: closed (texmathp and literal $)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2023 22:42:07 +0100
with message-id <86cz6dw8cw.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#61410: texmathp and literal $
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #61410,
regarding texmathp and literal $
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
61410: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61410
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> texmathp and literal $
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 10 Feb 2023 21:16:22 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> please consider this small example:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> \documentclass{article}
>
> \begin{document}
>
> text \verb|$|
>
> \end{document}
>
> %%% Local Variables:
> %%% mode: latex
> %%% TeX-master: t
> %%% End:
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Now do:
>
>   M-: (goto-char 58) RET
>   C-c C-f C-t
>
> and AUCTeX insert \mathtt{} at point.  Doing 'M-x texmathp RET' returns:
>
>   math-mode is on: $ begins at buffer position 55
>
> texmathp ignores the verb macro completely.  The similar scenario can be
> created for a verbatim-like environment.  Can others reproduce this?
> And if yes, any idea about course of action?
>
> Best, Arash
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#61410: texmathp and literal $
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 13 Feb 2023 22:42:07 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
>
>
>
>
> Ikumi Keita <ikumi@ikumi.que.jp> writes:
>
> > This looks good to me. It takes care of all possible difficulties I
> > worried. :-)
>
> What, maximum score? ;-) I installed the change incl. a test with commit
> de6aa05d7 and closing this report.  Many thanks for your comments.
>
> Best, Arash
>
>
> --- End Message ---