emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#55049: closed ([PATCH 0/3] gnu: Add cl-boost-{parse,re,lexer}.)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#55049: closed ([PATCH 0/3] gnu: Add cl-boost-{parse,re,lexer}.)
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 10:16:01 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 24 Apr 2022 10:09:05 +0000
with message-id <87tuaig53a.fsf@kitej>
and subject line Re: [bug#55049] [PATCH 0/3] gnu: Add cl-boost-{parse,re,lexer}.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #55049,
regarding [PATCH 0/3] gnu: Add cl-boost-{parse,re,lexer}.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
55049: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=55049
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 0/3] gnu: Add cl-boost-{parse,re,lexer}. Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 01:49:49 +0000
The PARSE and RE Common Lisp libraries (by https://github.com/massung) have
been seemingly migrated to the CL-BOOST organization
(https://github.com/cl-boost) — some of whose packages I've added in this
patch series —, probably to avoid potential conflicts with other CL library
names.
For now I've left the cl-parse and cl-re Guix packages alone, but if no one is
using them, they could be removed.

Paul A. Patience (3):
  gnu: Add cl-boost-parse.
  gnu: Add cl-boost-re.
  gnu: Add cl-boost-lexer.

 gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)

--
2.35.1





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#55049] [PATCH 0/3] gnu: Add cl-boost-{parse,re,lexer}. Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 10:09:05 +0000
"Paul A. Patience" <paul@apatience.com> skribis:

> On 2022-04-23 04:23:36-04:00, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote:
>
> The problem is that cl-boost-parse's (CL) package name is BOOST-PARSE,
> but cl-parse's package name is PARSE, so in fact they are not
> transparently interchangeable.

Indeed, they are different packages. So let's keep the old "parse" and
"re" packages for now (and these are also the only ones that are in
Quicklisp).
Patches pushed as 3ab9bd077849912b0d3518d1ccc375a9296fd99a and
following.
Thanks.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]