--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
13.1.2; Indentation for matrix environments |
|
Date: |
Fri, 15 Apr 2022 02:31:32 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 |
The only way I can get the indentation to work with matrix environments
like matrix, bmatrix, etc. is to start the line with \begin{matrix}. For
instance, putting:
Let $E = \begin{bmatrix}
1 & 0\\
0 & 1
\end{bmatrix}$ be the
identity matrix.
results in the indentation being offset for the remainder of the file.
Emacs : GNU Emacs 28.1 (build 1, x86_64-apple-darwin18.7.0, NS
appkit-1671.60 Version 10.14.6 (Build 18G95))
of 2022-04-04
Package: 13.1.2
current state:
==============
State could not be dumped due to the following error:
(void-function ,)
You should still send this bug report.
--
Robert Morelli
Department of Mathematics
Salt Lake Community College
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Re: bug#54949: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 19 Apr 2022 14:01:40 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 |
Robert Morelli <morelli@flux.utah.edu> writes:
> Reverting Emacs has been easy, but I don't know how to get back to
> AUCTeX 12.x. If you can suggest how I can do this, I would be
> grateful.
The recipe provided in the other response should work, it is also
described here[1].
> It is my opinion that Emacs development from this point forward should
> transition to legacy mode, with bug fixes and adaptations to OS
> upgrades, but with no further changes in behavior.
I suggest you take this comment to emacs-devel@gnu.org if you want to
discuss it seriously with the Emacs maintainers.
> New development should be diverted to using cross-editor technologies
> like language server protocol,
You can use LSP servers with Emacs through one of these clients:
• https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot
• https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-mode
> Those few of us who are still using Emacs are not eager to invest time
> adapting to new and potentially problematic behaviors, especially
> since almost all of us are probably already transitioning to other
> editors.
>
> If I may suggest, I would be happy to have the functionality of AUCTeX
> available in alternative editors. I think this would be welcomed by a
> much larger group of potential users than Emacs will likely ever again
> have.
As always, this means that someone(™) has to do the job. AUCTeX's
source code is available, if that someone wants to get an idea how it's
done in elisp.
I don't see we're discussing a bug, hence I'm closing this report.
Please feel free to re-open if a bug discussion will happen.
Best, Arash
Footnotes:
[1] https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/ELPA#h5o-10
--- End Message ---