bug#54861: closed ([PATCH 0/2] gnu: emacs-mu4e-patch: Rename and update)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2022 19:12:38 +0200
with message-id <877d7q2ruh.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#54861: [PATCH 0/2] gnu: emacs-mu4e-patch: Rename and 
update
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #54861,
regarding [PATCH 0/2] gnu: emacs-mu4e-patch: Rename and update
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
54861: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=54861
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH 0/2] gnu: emacs-mu4e-patch: Rename and update
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:52:29 -0400
>
>
>
>
> This patch series updates emacs-mu4e-patch to the latest version, and also
> reflects the name change that occurred upstream since this package works with
> both mu4e and gnus.
>
> Dominic Martinez (2):
>   gnu: emacs-mu4e-patch: Rename to emacs-message-view-patch
>   gnu: emacs-message-view-patch: Update to 0.2.0-40bc2e5
>
>  gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 6413d0898b92efda8213b3ced0b6d1c736726b89
> -- 
> 2.34.0
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#54861: [PATCH 0/2] gnu: emacs-mu4e-patch: Rename and update
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 15 Apr 2022 19:12:38 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Dominic Martinez <dom@dominicm.dev> skribis:
>
> > This patch series updates emacs-mu4e-patch to the latest version, and also
> > reflects the name change that occurred upstream since this package works with
> > both mu4e and gnus.
> >
> > Dominic Martinez (2):
> >   gnu: emacs-mu4e-patch: Rename to emacs-message-view-patch
> >   gnu: emacs-message-view-patch: Update to 0.2.0-40bc2e5
>
> Applied both, thanks!
>
> But actually, I use Gnus and patches have always been colorized.  Am I
> missing something?
>
> Ludo’.
>
>
> --- End Message ---