emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#53087: closed ([PATCH 13/41] gnu: rust-rbw: adding rust-sha1-asm-0.5


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#53087: closed ([PATCH 13/41] gnu: rust-rbw: adding rust-sha1-asm-0.5)
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:30:07 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 19 Jan 2022 14:29:32 +0100
with message-id <87zgnretvn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
and subject line Re: [bug#53075] [PATCH 1/41] gnu: rust-rbw: adding 
rust-zeroize-1.4
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #53075,
regarding [PATCH 13/41] gnu: rust-rbw: adding rust-sha1-asm-0.5
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
53075: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=53075
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 13/41] gnu: rust-rbw: adding rust-sha1-asm-0.5 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 15:05:34 +0100 User-agent: mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 28.0.50
>From 4a87442009745fe3e7dc2f2bba744f99c43ca38f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas Graves <ngraves@ngraves.fr>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 02:43:50 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 14/42] rust-rbw dependencies : adding rust-sha1-asm-0.5

---
 gnu/packages/crates-io.scm | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/crates-io.scm b/gnu/packages/crates-io.scm
index 01d74e5cdb..8b972fcc1a 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/crates-io.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/crates-io.scm
@@ -49735,10 +49735,10 @@ (define-public rust-sha1-0.2
                ((", path =.*}") "}"))
              #t)))))))
 
-(define-public rust-sha1-asm-0.4
+(define-public rust-sha1-asm-0.5
   (package
     (name "rust-sha1-asm")
-    (version "0.4.3")
+    (version "0.5.1")
     (source
      (origin
        (method url-fetch)
@@ -49747,7 +49747,7 @@ (define-public rust-sha1-asm-0.4
         (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz"))
        (sha256
         (base32
-         "1i1i8viy6y30mv9v5hwhg9w6b722qkyh9c6n8bn4d27jpv14pg0s"))))
+         "1b7ab7f4n87pqdmbl1a5jrc2axf27pvbndsz9qiwwgxw01qlygan"))))
     (build-system cargo-build-system)
     (arguments
      `(#:cargo-inputs
@@ -49758,6 +49758,21 @@ (define-public rust-sha1-asm-0.4
      "Assembly implementation of SHA-1 compression function.")
     (license license:expat)))
 
+(define-public rust-sha1-asm-0.4
+  (package
+    (inherit rust-sha1-asm-0.5)
+    (name "rust-sha1-asm")
+    (version "0.4.3")
+    (source
+     (origin
+       (method url-fetch)
+       (uri (crate-uri "sha1-asm" version))
+       (file-name
+        (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz"))
+       (sha256
+        (base32
+         "1i1i8viy6y30mv9v5hwhg9w6b722qkyh9c6n8bn4d27jpv14pg0s"))))))
+
 (define-public rust-sha1collisiondetection-0.2
   (package
     (name "rust-sha1collisiondetection")
-- 
2.34.0




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#53075] [PATCH 1/41] gnu: rust-rbw: adding rust-zeroize-1.4 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 14:29:32 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
Hello,

Nicolas Graves via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@gnu.org> writes:

> From 117ac2e745d1e9e2122bdf5859ae2b2781ca01c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nicolas Graves <ngraves@ngraves.fr>
> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 23:16:42 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 02/42] rust-rbw dependencies : adding rust-zeroize-1.4

Thank you. First some general notes about your patches.

The first thing is that your patch set should have gone under the same
bug number. You created more than 40 bugs for rbw. You may want to look
at "Contributing" section of the Guix manual for details.

Also, commit messages are normalized in Guix. You should look at what
I wrote instead of yours to get a feel about it.

Eventually, descriptions should consist of full sentences.

Now about this patch.

Unless under exceptional circumstances, we don't add a new package for
a change below the first non-zero digit. In this case, the common way is
to simply update rust-zeroize-1 to 1.4.3.

Therefore, I dropped this patch and did the above.

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]