bug#53332: closed ([version-1.4.0] python-black fails sanity-check)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:19:31 -0500
with message-id <87lezdisks.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [version-1.4.0] python-black fails sanity-check
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #53332,
regarding [version-1.4.0] python-black fails sanity-check
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
53332: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=53332
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [version-1.4.0] python-black fails sanity-check
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 17 Jan 2022 19:44:05 -0500
>
>
>
>
> Since the version-1.4.0 merge, python-black fails the sanity-check
> phase:
>
> ------
> starting phase `sanity-check'
> validating 'black' 
> /gnu/store/s2lic2m7cxzzfc19cans1i6q494484qm-python-black-21.12b0/lib/python3.9/site-packages
> ...checking requirements: ERROR: black==21.12b0 ContextualVersionConflict(tomli 
> 2.0.0 
> (/gnu/store/4k52mqy3c7dkgfmxgl21lzq3k9vx6gz5-python-tomli-2.0.0/lib/python3.9/site-packages),
>  Requirement.parse('tomli<2.0.0,>=0.2.6'), {'black'})
> error: in phase 'sanity-check': uncaught exception:
> %exception #<&invoke-error program: "python" arguments: 
> ("/gnu/store/35ix1m6m8a5s21j02ajhdyqxb2xkshfb-sanity-check.py" 
> "/gnu/store/s2lic2m7cxzzfc19cans1i6q494484qm-python-black-21.12b0/lib/python3.9/site-packages")
>  exit-status: 1 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f> 
> phase `sanity-check' failed after 0.2 seconds
> command "python" "/gnu/store/35ix1m6m8a5s21j02ajhdyqxb2xkshfb-sanity-check.py" 
> "/gnu/store/s2lic2m7cxzzfc19cans1i6q494484qm-python-black-21.12b0/lib/python3.9/site-packages"
>  failed with status 1
> builder for 
> `/gnu/store/fi5h4bk3qqyisdsp5lf35104sdaiv0vh-python-black-21.12b0.drv' failed 
> with exit code 1
> build of /gnu/store/fi5h4bk3qqyisdsp5lf35104sdaiv0vh-python-black-21.12b0.drv 
> failed
> ------
>
> Indeed, python-tomli was updated to 2.0.0, which is not considered
> compatible with python-black.
>
> This breaks 240 dependent packages.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: [version-1.4.0] python-black fails sanity-check
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:19:31 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 07:44:05PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> >> Indeed, python-tomli was updated to 2.0.0, which is not considered
> >> compatible with python-black.
> >> 
> >> This breaks 240 dependent packages.
> >
> > It's unfortunate that tomli itself has thousands of dependent packages.
> >
> > Things were fine on the version-1.4.0 branch, with an *older* version of
> > python-black:
> >
> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/359319/details
> >
> > It's surprising that later versions of python-black would be less
> > compatible with its dependencies, but that's what has happened:
> >
> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=spec%3Amaster+system%3Ax86_64-linux+python-black
> >
> > Maxim, do you remember why you updated python-tomli? Marius, do you
> > remember why you updated python-black? I could use some advice about how
> > to untangle this.
>
> The python-tomli brought a cleaner bootstrap path, IIRC.
>
> I fixed python-black by relaxing its requirement in
> d849be7b5fe7d6f20f9a46793d8ba6ca2a3a54ba.
>
> Closing.
>
> Thanks for the report!
>
> Maxim
>
>
> --- End Message ---