emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#52974: closed ([PATCH 0/5] Formatting package definitions with 'guix


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#52974: closed ([PATCH 0/5] Formatting package definitions with 'guix style')
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:04:02 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:03:37 +0100
with message-id <87h7abzo06.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#52974: [PATCH 0/5] Formatting package definitions with 
'guix style'
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #52974,
regarding [PATCH 0/5] Formatting package definitions with 'guix style'
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
52974: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=52974
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Formatting package definitions with 'guix style' Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 11:53:35 +0100
Hello Guix!

This patch set extends ‘guix style’ so that it can format
package definitions following our conventions.  It adds a
new ‘-S’ option to ‘guix style’, which allows you to select
a “styling rule”.

To obtain the same behavior as before, you now need to run
‘guix style -S inputs’ (this is an incompatibility); ‘guix
style’ alone is equivalent to ‘guix style -S format’, which
formats the given package definition(s).

The code of the pretty printer is not pretty, but it does a
rather good job, notably because it recognizes our special
forms and rules, unlike ‘pretty-print’.  I’m sure we could
spend months tweaking it, but I think it’s reached the point
where we can recommend it.

This nicely replaces ‘etc/indent-code.el’ and will hopefully
make the lives of contributors easier.

Thoughts?

Eventually we should change importers to use this instead of
(ice-9 pretty-print).  I also envision a rule to rewrite Rust
packages to look like regular packages, as discussed earlier
with Efraim, which will benefit from this work.

Ludo’.

Ludovic Courtès (5):
  style: Improve pretty printer and add tests.
  style: Allow special forms to be scoped.
  style: Add support for "newline forms".
  style: Add '--styling' option.
  style: '-S format' canonicalizes comments.

 doc/contributing.texi  |  18 +-
 doc/guix.texi          |  60 +++++-
 etc/indent-code.el     | 120 ------------
 guix/scripts/style.scm | 415 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 tests/style.scm        | 162 +++++++++++++++-
 5 files changed, 571 insertions(+), 204 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100755 etc/indent-code.el


base-commit: 637dec9d45db4df2a3e6aa565fa2c5cf6bb77768
-- 
2.33.0




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#52974: [PATCH 0/5] Formatting package definitions with 'guix style' Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:03:37 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:

> This patch set extends ‘guix style’ so that it can format
> package definitions following our conventions.  It adds a
> new ‘-S’ option to ‘guix style’, which allows you to select
> a “styling rule”.

Applied!

  0976e92a0f news: Add news entry about 'guix style'.
  5d9a5e2301 style: '-S format' canonicalizes comments.
  c4fe13c294 style: Add '--styling' option.
  6f892630ae style: Add support for "newline forms".
  208a7aa17b style: Allow special forms to be scoped.
  97d0055edb style: Improve pretty printer and add tests.

There wasn’t any formal comment during the review process, which is
unfortunate, but of course we can still tweak ‘guix style’ as we go.

Ludo’.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]