emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#52942: closed ([PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add odio-sacd.)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#52942: closed ([PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add odio-sacd.)
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2022 05:40:01 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 2 Jan 2022 00:39:04 -0500
with message-id <YdE6eBf+41LFi0MN@jasmine.lan>
and subject line Re: [bug#52942] [PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add odio-sacd.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #52942,
regarding [PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add odio-sacd.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
52942: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=52942
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add odio-sacd. Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2022 00:14:50 +0100
This patch series adds te odio-sacd package.  The first patch adds the library
it depends on.

Arjan Adriaanse (2):
  gnu: Add libodiosacd.
  gnu: Add odio-sacd.

 gnu/packages/audio.scm | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)


base-commit: 637dec9d45db4df2a3e6aa565fa2c5cf6bb77768
-- 
2.34.0




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#52942] [PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add odio-sacd. Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2022 00:39:04 -0500
On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 12:14:50AM +0100, Arjan Adriaanse wrote:
> This patch series adds te odio-sacd package.  The first patch adds the library
> it depends on.
> 
> Arjan Adriaanse (2):
>   gnu: Add libodiosacd.
>   gnu: Add odio-sacd.

Thank you for these patches! I pushed as
0e4a23098ac274c79351a423410867e549729794 with the following changes:

I changed the license to gpl3+. Looking at the source file headers, I
see they all seem to say "either version 3 of the License, or (at your
option) any later version", so we pass the option on to our users as
well. For example:

https://github.com/tari01/odio-sacd/blob/master/src/main.c

I also changed "wave" to "WAV" in the descriptions, since I found the
former to be ambiguous, and I also tweaked the synopses to be less
self-referential and (hopefully!) more useful for readers.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]