emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#51778: closed (29.0.50; gnus-search uses `message' instead of `gnus-


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#51778: closed (29.0.50; gnus-search uses `message' instead of `gnus-message')
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2021 17:29:01 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 03 Dec 2021 09:28:12 -0800
with message-id <8735n9zjgz.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
and subject line Re: bug#51778: 29.0.50; gnus-search uses `message' instead of 
`gnus-message'
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #51778,
regarding 29.0.50; gnus-search uses `message' instead of `gnus-message'
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
51778: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=51778
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 29.0.50; gnus-search uses `message' instead of `gnus-message' Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 21:59:15 +0000 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Hi,

In gnus-search, there are several logs (some of them quite verbose when
one's iterating over long lists of groups) using `message'.  I think
that it'd be better to use `gnus-message' instead, with levels as
appropriate.  That way one can avoid (or enable!) them via gnus-verbose.

I'm attaching a patch changing them all to level 7, since they looked
like debug messages to me; but it's just a suggestion.

Thanks!
jao

Attachment: 0001-Use-gnus-message-for-logging-in-gnus-search.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#51778: 29.0.50; gnus-search uses `message' instead of `gnus-message' Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2021 09:28:12 -0800 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
>
>> Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
>>
>>> merge 51335
>>> quit
>>
>> Obviously I still don't know how this works, anyway this should be
>> rolled in with bug#51335.
>
> I think "forcemerge" works better...

I haven't had time to sit and work on the larger project of logging,
etc, so I'm doing some spot fixes first.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]