--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH] doc: Add item to "Submitting Patches" section. |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:20:03 +0200 |
* doc/contributing.texi (Submitting Patches): Add item about 'git-format-patch
--base'.
---
doc/contributing.texi | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/contributing.texi b/doc/contributing.texi
index af3601442e..5ea3cb1899 100644
--- a/doc/contributing.texi
+++ b/doc/contributing.texi
@@ -932,6 +932,12 @@ Before submitting a patch that adds or modifies a package
definition,
please run through this check list:
@enumerate
+@cindex @code{git format-patch}
+@cindex @code{git-format-patch}
+@item
+We recommend to use the command @code{git format-patch --base} to
+include the commit where your patch applies.
+
@item
If the authors of the packaged software provide a cryptographic
signature for the release tarball, make an effort to verify the
base-commit: e746d30ec15852ec50e4247ea0a07ab2a9a69aa8
--
2.28.0
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#43946: [PATCH] doc: Add item to "Submitting Patches" section. |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Sep 2021 15:02:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:
> Seeing the number of patches in the patch tracker, most of them does not
> apply anymore. It is not encouraging to review and decrease the queue
> when first the reviewer has to guess onto which commit the patch
> applies.
Yeah in hindsight I think I agree with you. I went ahead and (finally!)
applied the patch.
Thanks for persevering, and apologies for my stubbornness! :-)
Ludo’.
--- End Message ---