bug#43153: closed (Add new command project-find-dir (and move binding of project-dired))

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 21 Sep 2021 03:57:27 +0300
with message-id <469d1164-3469-e8a7-ec45-430dea761381@yandex.ru>
and subject line Re: bug#43153: Add new command project-find-dir (and move 
binding of project-dired)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #43153,
regarding Add new command project-find-dir (and move binding of project-dired)
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
43153: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43153
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Add new command project-find-dir (and move binding of project-dired)
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 1 Sep 2020 03:48:55 -0700
>
>
>
>
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Please consider adding a new command `project-find-dir' that works like
> `project-find-file' but for directories.
>
> I would also suggest to move `project-dired to `C-c p D' and put the new
> `project-find-dir' command on `C-c p d'.  These key bindings would be in
> line with the third-party projectile package.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#43153: Add new command project-find-dir (and move binding of project-dired)
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 21 Sep 2021 03:57:27 +0300
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
>
>
>
>
> Version: 28.1
>
> On 20.09.2021 18:29, Stefan Kangas wrote:
> > Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> writes:
> >
> > > > I don't see one way as fundamentally better than the other, so IMHO it's
> > > > better to just have the same UI as projectile.
> > >
> > > OK, that makes sense. Easier transition, etc.
> >
> > Yup, that's my thinking too.
>
> Now installed with commit df1d4f5894.
>
> > (In my use, project does everything I need so while projectile is
> > still installed it goes largely unused these days.)
>
> Good to hear ;-)
>
> But as far as missing pieces go, I think people are still asking for 
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/41572, in some shape or form.
>
> Emacs 28 probably should have a solution for it.
>
>
> --- End Message ---