bug#30210: closed (pandoc not reproducible)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2021 18:41:32 -0700
with message-id <86tuipjlpv.fsf@mgsn.dev>
and subject line Re: bug#30210: pandoc not reproducible
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #30210,
regarding pandoc not reproducible
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
30210: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30210
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> pandoc not reproducible
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:09:21 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> mu4e 1.0-alpha3; emacs 25.3.1
>
>
>
>
> The ghc-pandoc package for version 1.17.2 cannot be built reproducibly.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#30210: pandoc not reproducible
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 12 Sep 2021 18:41:32 -0700
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>
> > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> >
> >> Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> skribis:
> >>
> >>>> The only file that differs is this:
> >>>>
> >>>>   
> >>>> /gnu/store/8ynsssfjjdjbawndmjlnjlqrh027rl9g-ghc-pandoc-1.17.2-check/lib/ghc-7.10.2/ghc-pandoc-1.17.2.conf.d/package.cache
> >>>>   
> >>>> /gnu/store/8ynsssfjjdjbawndmjlnjlqrh027rl9g-ghc-pandoc-1.17.2/lib/ghc-7.10.2/ghc-pandoc-1.17.2.conf.d/package.cache
> >>>
> >>> At least they seem to contain the same strings albeit in a different
> >>> order.  “diff <(strings a|sort) <(strings b|sort)” shows no
> >>> differences.  (Of course there could be other differences than order,
> >>> which simply don’t appear to be strings.)
> >>
> >> That sounds like code using readdir(2) and not sorting the returned
> >> entries, as was the case for gtk-update-icon-cache or whatever it’s
> >> called.
> >
> > This package.cache problem has been fixed with commit
> > 5de93cdba77db3777f8f026c029acadd7b8bdde3.
> >
> > Unfortunately it is now bin/pandoc that differs across builds.
> >
> > --
> > Ricardo
>
> I found this old bug.  I tested both pandoc and ghc-pandoc and it looks
> like this is no longer an issue (perhaps fixed partially in #43834), so
> I'm closing.  Please reopen otherwise.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Sarah
>
>
> --- End Message ---