bug#50461: closed ([core-updates-frozen] backtrace on `guix package -A')

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 07 Sep 2021 12:53:33 -0700
with message-id <86y288go1u.fsf@mgsn.dev>
and subject line Re: bug#50461: [core-updates-frozen] backtrace on `guix 
package -A'
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #50461,
regarding [core-updates-frozen] backtrace on `guix package -A'
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
50461: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=50461
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [core-updates-frozen] backtrace on `guix package -A'
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 07 Sep 2021 11:11:23 -0700
>
>
>
>
> Hello Guix,
>
> I'm getting a backtrace on `guix package -A'.  The argument doesn't seem
> to matter, and `guix package -s' works fine.
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> sarah@gnu ~/guix-cu-frozen [env]$ ./pre-inst-env guix describe
> Git checkout:
>   repository: /home/sarah/guix/.git/worktrees
>   branch: HEAD
>   commit: 445eec918332c1b8d4a6ba4baf1322e13076029b
> sarah@gnu ~/guix-cu-frozen [env]$ ./pre-inst-env guix package -A foo
> Backtrace:
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>    460:18 19 (fold #<procedure 7f2a479a8a20 at guix/packages.scm:10…> …)
> In guix/packages.scm:
>   1088:40 18 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
> In guix/memoization.scm:
>     100:0 17 (_ #<hash-table 7f2a53d73380 331/443> (#<package co…> …) …)
> In guix/packages.scm:
>   1084:10 16 (_)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>    460:18 15 (fold #<procedure 7f2a47a1a1e0 at guix/packages.scm:10…> …)
> In guix/packages.scm:
>   1088:40 14 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
> In guix/memoization.scm:
>     100:0 13 (_ #<hash-table 7f2a53d73380 331/443> (#<package gt…> …) …)
> In guix/packages.scm:
>   1084:10 12 (_)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>    460:18 11 (fold #<procedure 7f2a47a1a1b0 at guix/packages.scm:10…> …)
> In guix/packages.scm:
>   1088:40 10 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
> In guix/memoization.scm:
>     100:0  9 (_ #<hash-table 7f2a53d73380 331/443> (#<package db…> …) …)
> In guix/packages.scm:
>   1092:35  8 (_)
>   1331:16  7 (package->bag _ _ _ #:graft? _)
>   1432:48  6 (thunk)
> In gnu/packages/docbook.scm:
>    479:28  5 (inputs #<package dblatex@0.3.12 gnu/packages/docbook.s…>)
>    405:19  4 (inputs #<package dblatex@0.3.12 gnu/packages/docbook.s…>)
> In gnu/packages/tex.scm:
>   4103:18  3 (texlive-updmap.cfg _)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>    460:18  2 (fold #<procedure 7f2a4e4d22b0 at gnu/packages/tex.scm…> …)
> In gnu/packages/tex.scm:
>   4104:26  1 (_ _ _)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   1685:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
>
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
> In procedure struct-vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting 
> struct): #<syntax-transformer texlive-latex-hyperref>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> --
> Sarah
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#50461: [core-updates-frozen] backtrace on `guix package -A'
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 07 Sep 2021 12:53:33 -0700
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sarah Morgensen <iskarian@mgsn.dev> skribis:
> >
> >> I'm getting a backtrace on `guix package -A'.  The argument doesn't seem
> >> to matter, and `guix package -s' works fine.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> In gnu/packages/tex.scm:
> >>   4104:26  1 (_ _ _)
> >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> >>   1685:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
> >>
> >> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
> >> In procedure struct-vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting 
> >> struct): #<syntax-transformer texlive-latex-hyperref>
> >
> > I believe rebuilding will fix it:
> >
> >   rm gnu/packages/*.go && make -j4
>
> That fixed it.  Sorry for the alarm!
>
> (It seems that "make" for guix/guile is not very good at determining
> what needs to be recompiled... this isn't the first time "make"
> succeeded by still caused issues.)
>
> --
> Sarah
>
>
> --- End Message ---