emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#43893: closed (make update-guix-package produced an incorrect hash)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#43893: closed (make update-guix-package produced an incorrect hash)
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:05:01 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:04:18 -0400
with message-id <87ft6a5bz1.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#43893: [PATCH v2] maint: update-guix-package: Prevent 
accidentally breaking guix pull.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #43893,
regarding make update-guix-package produced an incorrect hash
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
43893: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43893
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: make update-guix-package produced an incorrect hash Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 17:58:39 -0400
Hello,

Today, I used 'make update-guix-package' and pushed the result (commit
f08587682a).  Users later reported being unable to pull because of a
hash mismatch on the newly updated Guix package :-/.

I haven't investigated why yet, and simply reverted the faulty update
for now in commit a279f7c61c.

Thank you,

Maxim



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#43893: [PATCH v2] maint: update-guix-package: Prevent accidentally breaking guix pull. Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:04:18 -0400 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
Hello!

I went ahead and merged this with commit 5800d2aae2.  I think it
provides more benefits (breaking 'guix pull' is quite bad) than
drawbacks.

Thanks for your input!

Closing,

Maxim


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]