|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | bug#43950: closed (lz4 CC=gcc - Why?) |
Date: | Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:19:01 +0000 |
Your message dated Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:18:26 +0200 with message-id <87eem3invh.fsf@nckx> and subject line Re: bug#43950: lz4 CC=gcc - Why? has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #43950, regarding lz4 CC=gcc - Why? to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact help-debbugs@gnu.org.) -- 43950: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43950 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: lz4 CC=gcc - Why? Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:21:53 +0200 * lz4 has "CC=gcc". Shouldn't that be (string-append "CC=" (cc-for-target)) ?pgp9aSmIotPca.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#43950: lz4 CC=gcc - Why? Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:18:26 +0200 Danny, Danny Milosavljevic 写道:lz4 CC=gcc - Why?For the same reason as the *hundreds* of other ‘CC=gcc’ occurrences in the tree: CC-FOR-TARGET is new. Out of all of them, why are you so interested in LZ4 (I think this is your second mail on it :-)?I'm currently slogging through the "CC=gcc"s & removing as many as possible; not fun work but can be done completely off-line.LZ4 tweaked in 2b6ecdf41a09ab9ecae06d7c537583a2f0f28efc, T G-Rsignature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |