--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH 00/13] Update Pandoc. |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:34:42 +0100 |
Update ghc-pandoc to 2.92 and rename it to pandoc.
This closes bug 33844.
Questions:
- Should this go on staging? It rebuilds a few hundred packages, maybe less
than 300.
- I'm not 100% sure that updating the Haskell libraries didn't break
anything. I guess the continuous integration will tell us.
- 3-4 libraries seemed to have many dependents and updating them would break
stuff, so instead I created a versioned package, e.g. ghc-regex-base-0.94.
Is this OK? Is there a best practice here?
Pierre Neidhardt (13):
gnu: ghc-hsyaml: Update to 0.2.1.0.
gnu: ghc-doctemplates: Update to 0.8.1.
gnu: Add ghc-regex-base-0.94.
gnu: ghc-regex-pcre-builtin: Update to 0.95.1.1.8.43.
gnu: ghc-skylighting-core: Update to 0.8.3.2.
gnu: ghc-skylighting: Update to 0.8.3.2.
gnu: ghc-pandoc-types: Update to 1.20.
gnu: ghc-texmath: Update to 0.12.0.1.
gnu: Add ghc-base-compat-0.11.
gnu: Add ghc-optparse-applicative-0.15.
gnu: ghc-haddock-library: Update to 1.8.0.
gnu: ghc-pandoc: Update to 2.9.2.
gnu: ghc-pandoc: Rename to pandoc.
gnu/local.mk | 2 -
gnu/packages/haskell-xyz.scm | 130 ++++++++++++------
.../patches/ghc-pandoc-fix-html-tests.patch | 92 -------------
.../patches/ghc-pandoc-fix-latex-test.patch | 31 -----
4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/ghc-pandoc-fix-html-tests.patch
delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/ghc-pandoc-fix-latex-test.patch
--
2.25.0
--- End Message ---