emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#43127: closed (27.1; gnus-use-correct-string-widths is still documen


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#43127: closed (27.1; gnus-use-correct-string-widths is still documented in the Gnus Info manual)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:49:03 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:48:17 -0700
with message-id <87d036ejny.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
and subject line Re: bug#43127: 27.1; gnus-use-correct-string-widths is still 
documented in the Gnus Info manual
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #43127,
regarding 27.1; gnus-use-correct-string-widths is still documented in the Gnus 
Info manual
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
43127: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43127
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 27.1; gnus-use-correct-string-widths is still documented in the Gnus Info manual Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 01:10:32 +0200
Evaluate the following form in the scratch buffer:

(info "(gnus) Wide characters")

The documentation for this topic says "To help fix this, you can set
‘gnus-use-correct-string-widths’ to ‘t’"; however, the
'gnus-use-correct-string-widths' variable is not available anymore.

If an alternative way to achieve what's described in the manual is
available, it should be documented instead; if not, the whole section
should be removed to avoid confusion.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#43127: 27.1; gnus-use-correct-string-widths is still documented in the Gnus Info manual Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:48:17 -0700 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
On 08/31/20 20:23 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
>> Cc: 43127@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:34:33 -0700
>> 
>> Good catch! Eli, it's okay to remove this manual section in the 27
>> branch, right?
>
> Yes, of course.

Thanks -- there goes.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]