--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
26.0.90; flymake-warning's default color might be inappropriate |
|
Date: |
Tue, 7 Nov 2017 16:49:11 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:56.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/56.0 |
I've never seen this discussed, and this might be a subjective opinion.
But AFAICT, the flymake-warnline face, previously, used DarkOrange (now
it's an obsolete alias). Flycheck also uses this color for warnings.
Flymake's own fringe indicators (for warning) also use an orange color
by default, inheriting it from the `warning' face through
`compilation-warning'.
So I think that flymake-warning should use it as well.
The current blue is pretty and all, but it conveys an optimistic mood,
not something I would associate with a warning.
+++
In GNU Emacs 26.0.90 (build 5, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.11)
of 2017-11-07 built on zappa
Repository revision: ca2d94ba61dee678f85bfc7299d167e7219e6d8f
Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11903000
System Description: Ubuntu 17.04
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Re: bug#29192: 26.0.90; flymake-warning's default color might be inappropriate |
|
Date: |
Mon, 10 Aug 2020 16:48:58 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> writes:
> Thank you for the response, but I have warmed up to this new color in the
> years
> since the change was made. Maybe not very indicative of being a warning, it is
> nevertheless more noticeable than DarkOrange.
>
> Which is a nice property to have.
>
> If you really like the suggestion, I welcome you to play with the
> color change a little. Otherwise, we can just close this.
That sounds good to me so I'll just close this. Thanks!
Best regards,
Stefan Kangas
--- End Message ---