emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#42573: closed ([PATCH 0/2] gnu: python-clikit: Update to 0.6.2.)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#42573: closed ([PATCH 0/2] gnu: python-clikit: Update to 0.6.2.)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 18:02:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 30 Jul 2020 21:01:37 +0300
with message-id <875za4lw5a.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [bug#42573] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: python-clikit: Update to 
0.6.2.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #42573,
regarding [PATCH 0/2] gnu: python-clikit: Update to 0.6.2.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
42573: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=42573
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 0/2] gnu: python-clikit: Update to 0.6.2. Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:22:21 +0200
Tanguy Le Carrour (2):
  gnu: Add python-crashtest.
  gnu: python-clikit: Update to 0.6.2.

 gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
2.27.0




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#42573] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: python-clikit: Update to 0.6.2. Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 21:01:37 +0300 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
Hi,

Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy@bioneland.org> writes:

>>Could you take a look on a fetching source with ‘git-fetch’ and enabling
>>tests suite?
>
> Actually, I can't! :-(
>
> `crashtest` is a project managed with Poetry. In order to build and test it,
> I need `poetry`. But `poetry` depends on `clikit` that depends on… 
> `crashtest`!
>
> I guess (I hope) that more and more projects will be managed with Poetry,
> so we'll run into this problem again.
>
> There's actually an other problem with Poetry: `poetry` is managed with 
> Poetry!
> I have no idea how to handle this! Is this a scenario where we have to have
> a `poetry-0` that is a "trusted" binary that we use to "properly" build
> the "poetry chain"?

OK, thanks for investigation.  I pushed the changes to master.

Oleg.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]