bug#19014: closed (25.0.50; Disable Org, Tbl, & Text menu items that change buffer when read-only)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 22 May 2020 14:31:02 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#19014: 25.0.50; Disable Org, Tbl, & Text menu items 
that change buffer when read-only
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #19014,
regarding 25.0.50; Disable Org, Tbl, & Text menu items that change buffer when 
read-only
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
19014: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19014
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 25.0.50; Disable Org, Tbl, & Text menu items that change buffer when read-only
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:13:08 -0800 (PST)
>
>
>
>
> There are lots of menu items in the Org menu-bar menus (Org, Tbl, Text)
> that modify the buffer but are not disabled when the buffer is
> read-only.  They should be - they are no-ops in this context.
>
> This is all the more important because there are still plenty of menu
> items for commands that are useful in a read-only buffer.  Disabling the
> others makes those that are available more obvious and easier to select.
>
> That is what we do for the Edit menu, for example.  You can use it as a
> model, here.
>
> In GNU Emacs 25.0.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32)
>  of 2014-10-20 on LEG570
> Bzr revision: 118168 address@hidden-20141020195941-icp42t8ttcnud09g
> Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
> Configured using:
>  `configure --enable-checking=yes,glyphs CPPFLAGS=-DGLYPH_DEBUG=1'
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#19014: 25.0.50; Disable Org, Tbl, & Text menu items that change buffer when read-only
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 22 May 2020 14:31:02 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi Drew,
>
> Adams <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Your call.  It doesn't matter to me, personally.  I'm thinking
> > only of Org users - what might help them.  And you obviously are
> > a better judge of that.  Feel free to close the bug, if you don't
> > think it needs or is worth fixing.
>
> I've never seen this issue brought by Org users in the last six years
> so I guess we can safely close this, which I'm doing now.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- 
>  Bastien
>
>
> --- End Message ---