bug#41076: closed ([PATCH] services: For sddm pam service include limits.conf.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 05 May 2020 20:02:16 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#41076] [PATCH] services: For sddm pam service include 
limits.conf.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #41076,
regarding [PATCH] services: For sddm pam service include limits.conf.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
41076: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=41076
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] services: For sddm pam service include limits.conf. Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 15:08:32 +0000 User-agent: Roundcube Webmail

Hello Guix,
This fixes bug #37380 for SDDM users.

Today I was setting up my system following [0] to use realtime scheduling with JACK and SuperCollider. After a lot of failures and a lot of help on IRC from rekado I found out that it wasn't me it was just a bug.

The bug is the same as [1] and my solution is the same as [2] but for SDDM. I tested my patch with the attached system configuration (shamelessly copied from [3]).

Thanks,

Giacomo

[0]: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Base-Services.html#index-realtime

[1]: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/37380
[2]: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/37405
[3]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2019-09/msg00065.html

0001-services-For-sddm-pam-service-include-limits.conf.patch
Description: Text Data

jack-sddm.scm
Description: Text document

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#41076] [PATCH] services: For sddm pam service include limits.conf. Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 20:02:16 +0200 User-agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

address@hidden writes:

> Hello Guix,
> This fixes bug #37380 for SDDM users.
>
> Today I was setting up my system following [0] to use realtime 
> scheduling with JACK and SuperCollider. After a lot of failures and a 
> lot of help on IRC from rekado I found out that it wasn't me it was just 
> a bug.
>
> The bug is the same as [1] and my solution is the same as [2] but for 
> SDDM. I tested my patch with the attached system configuration 
> (shamelessly copied from [3]).

Applied, thanks!

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---