bug#40059: closed (lisp-mode indentation not aligned vertically)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 03 May 2020 03:13:08 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#40059: lisp-mode indentation not aligned vertically
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #40059,
regarding lisp-mode indentation not aligned vertically
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
40059: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40059
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> lisp-mode indentation not aligned vertically
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:46:48 -0700
>
>
>
>
> This code sample demonstrates what I consider to be a bug in the
> lisp-mode indentation.
>
> Here is a very simple example:
>
> (:a :b
>  :c
>     :d
>  :e)
>
>
> Here it is in an actual use case (defining Common Lisp packages)
> (defpackage :example
>   (:use :cl)
>
>   ;; Here is the weird part:
>   (:export :thing1
>    :thing2
>            :thing3
>     :thing4
>            :thing5))
>
> A sane, non-buggy indentation would be this:
> (defpackage :example
>   (:use :cl)
>
>   ;; These are aligned vertically:
>   (:export :thing1
>            :thing2
>            :thing3
>            :thing4
>            :thing5))
>
> This seems to be primarily caused by the keyword argument as the first
> element of the unquoted list.
>
> This is especially an issue if using aggressive formatting like
> aggressive indent mode. 
> <https://github.com/Malabarba/aggressive-indent-mode/issues/122>
>
> -- 
> Spenser Truex
> spensertruex.com
> SFSU Computer Science
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#40059: lisp-mode indentation not aligned vertically
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 03 May 2020 03:13:08 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> martin rudalics <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> Here is my M-x version
> >> GNU Emacs 27.0.90 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.14) of 
> >> 2020-03-07
> >
> > Have you tried with emacs -Q?
>
> More information was requested, but none was given within 6 weeks, so
> I'm closing this bug.  It was already tagged unreproducible.
>
> If this is still an issue, please reply to this email (use "Reply to
> all" in your email client) and we can reopen the bug report.
>
> Best regards,
> Stefan Kangas
>
>
> --- End Message ---