bug#39210: closed (Guile 3.0: &assertion undefined in (rnrs conditions (6)))

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:58:20 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#39210: Guile 3.0: &assertion undefined in (rnrs 
conditions (6))
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #39210,
regarding Guile 3.0: &assertion undefined in (rnrs conditions (6))
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
39210: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39210
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Guile 3.0: &assertion undefined in (rnrs conditions (6))
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 20 Jan 2020 23:31:48 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3
>
>
>
>
> The module (rnrs conditions (6)) exports &assertion but renames the
> imported &assertion-failure to &assertion-violation (not &assertion).
> Programs using &assertion from (rnrs conditions) fail with an unbound
> variable error.
>
> Using &violation instead of &assertion works.
>
> --
> Ricardo
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#39210: Guile 3.0: &assertion undefined in (rnrs conditions (6))
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:58:20 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > The module (rnrs conditions (6)) exports &assertion but renames the
> > imported &assertion-failure to &assertion-violation (not &assertion).
> > Programs using &assertion from (rnrs conditions) fail with an unbound
> > variable error.
> >
> > Using &violation instead of &assertion works.
>
> I believe commit 1b8e9ca0e37fab366435436995248abdfc780a10 fixes it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ludo’.
>
>
> --- End Message ---