bug#38970: closed ([PATCH 21/22] gnu: pjproject-jami: Apply a missing patch.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 6 Jan 2020 19:05:57 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Closing the broken patch
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #38970,
regarding [PATCH 21/22] gnu: pjproject-jami: Apply a missing patch.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
38970: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38970
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH 21/22] gnu: pjproject-jami: Apply a missing patch.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon,  6 Jan 2020 02:11:51 +0100
>
>
>
>
> ---
>  gnu/packages/jami.scm | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/jami.scm b/gnu/packages/jami.scm
> index ea66bed8a5..22c86e9b5b 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/jami.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/jami.scm
> @@ -165,7 +165,8 @@
>                                                  "fix_ebusy_turn"
>                                                  
> "ignore_ipv6_on_transport_check"
>                                                  "fix_turn_connection_failure"
> -                                                "disable_local_resolution"))
> +                                                "disable_local_resolution"
> +                                               
> "fix_assert_on_connection_attempt"))
>                 #t)))
>           ;; TODO: We could use substitute-keyword-arguments instead of
>           ;; repeating the phases from pjproject, but somehow it does
> -- 
> 2.24.1
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Closing the broken patch
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 6 Jan 2020 19:05:57 +0100
>
>
>
>
> I broke the whole patch series, sorry, hope this solves everything.
> I got smtp error and thought patches didn't send.
>
>
> Jan Wielkiewicz
>
>
> --- End Message ---