bug#37811: closed ("standard GNU Emacs Lisp")

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:56:45 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#37811: "standard GNU Emacs Lisp"
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #37811,
regarding "standard GNU Emacs Lisp"
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
37811: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=37811
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> "standard GNU Emacs Lisp"
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 18 Oct 2019 12:11:34 -0500
>
>
>
>
> Section 5.7 of the Elisp manual ("Using Lists as Sets") mentions
> "standard GNU Emacs Lisp". This makes it sound like there is a
> language standard, which is not the case. I suggest changing the word
> "standard". Possible alternatives: "basic", "plain", "out-of-the-box".
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#37811: "standard GNU Emacs Lisp"
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:56:45 +0200
>
>
>
>
> > From: Stefan Kangas <address@hidden>
> > Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden,  address@hidden
> > Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:48:59 +0100
> > 
> > > Or maybe we should simply say this:
> > >
> > >   Common Lisp note: Common Lisp has functions ‘union’ (which avoids
> > >   duplicate elements) and ‘intersection’ for set operations.  In Emacs
> > >   Lisp, variants of these facilities are provided by the ‘cl-lib’
> > >   library.  *Note (cl)Lists as Sets::.
> > 
> > Yes, this is much better than the other proposed alternatives.  Please
> > push such a change.  (The file to edit is emacs/doc/lispref/lists.texi
> > row 1215.)
>
> Done.
>
>
> --- End Message ---